On January 22, information from the crypto industry indicated that several leading platforms have begun to treat quantum computing as a long-term security variable that requires early preparation. Most mainstream blockchain systems today, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, rely heavily on elliptic curve cryptography as the foundation for account security and transaction verification.
At present, these cryptographic systems are still widely regarded as secure. However, as both the theoretical models and engineering capabilities of large-scale, general-purpose quantum computers continue to advance, the possibility that such systems could be weakened or broken in the future has increasingly entered industry discussions.
Cross-Disciplinary Responses Become a Shared Direction
Against this backdrop, establishing independent advisory mechanisms focused on quantum computing and blockchain is viewed as an important step in forward-looking risk management. Relevant planning emphasizes that quantum risk is not a single technical issue, but rather one that spans cryptography, distributed systems, protocol design, and engineering implementation.
By bringing together cross-disciplinary experts from academia and industry, the ecosystem can systematically assess potential vulnerabilities in existing systems before quantum computing reaches practical attack capabilities, while also providing a research foundation for future protocol upgrades and migration paths.
The Practical Significance of Post-Quantum Security Planning
Public information suggests that post-quantum security roadmaps will prioritize risk assessment, technological preparedness, and industry consensus-building, rather than pursuing aggressive short-term modifications to existing blockchain architectures. Related position papers and research outcomes are expected to offer developers and institutions analytical frameworks for understanding potential threats, along with defensive strategies applicable at different stages of technological development.
Such forward-looking planning reflects a growing industry awareness of “low-probability, high-impact” risks.
The Continued Expansion of the Security Perspective
As blockchain technology becomes increasingly integrated into broader financial and commercial contexts, security considerations are no longer limited to immediate attacks or known vulnerabilities. Instead, they are extending to long-term variables such as cryptographic assumptions and the evolution of computational power. The discussion around quantum computing is a clear manifestation of this trend.
From an operational perspective, institutions are typically required to address both short-term risks and long-term uncertainties simultaneously. This includes real-time monitoring of on-chain transactions and fund flows, alongside continuous evaluation of underlying technological developments.
From Long-Term Security to Sustainable Compliance
Throughout this process, structured analysis of on-chain behavior and the establishment of traceable risk awareness remain among the most practical security foundations at the current stage. On-chain risk analysis systems such as Trustformer KYT are increasingly used to help institutions understand real-world transaction risks and compliance boundaries, providing support for the stable operation of digital assets within existing regulatory frameworks.
As technology cycles continue to lengthen, security and compliance are gradually shifting from reactive responses toward more forward-looking, systematic construction.